JAMES F. POLK – Initial Letter of Admission | 4-20-19

– Had to wait to pay and start because of a levied paycheck and covid, lol.  October 18,2021.

– I am working on the J.D. with AISOL to become a Private Investigator in California.

 

——————————————————————————————————————————-

 

AISOL STUDENT LOGIN   –    STUDY LOG

Quimbee – Flemmings – Brief Template

GENERAL CATALOG  –  PURCHASE ITEMS  –  CSV STUDY LOG

SYLABUS  –  INTRODUCTION TO LAW & LEGAL WRITING – FHIRAC v. FHCRRACC

SYLABUS  –  MIDTERM QUESTION  – MIDTERM RESPONSE –  CONTRACT LAW DEFINITIONS  –  OUTLINE

• Case Brief #1 – Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co., 382 P.2d 109 (1962)
  • (Remedial Goals of Contract Damages)
• Case Brief #2 – Hadley v. Baxendale, 9 Exch 341, 156 Eng. Rep. 145 (1854)
  • (Limitation on Expectation Damages)
• Case Brief #3 – Parker v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 3 Cal.3d 176, 474 P.2d 689 (1970)
  • (Limitation on Expectation Damages)
• Case Brief #4 – Webb v. McGowin, 27 Ala App. 82, 168 So. 196, 232 Ala. 374 (1936)
  • (Moral Obligation)
• Case Brief #5 – Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon, 118 N.E. 214, 222 N.Y. 88, (1917)
  • (Promises Grounded in the Past)
• Case Brief #6 – Drennan v. Star Paving Co., 51 Cal.2d 409, 333 P.2d 757 (1958)
  • (Reliance)
• Case Brief #7 – Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc., 32 N.J. 358, 161 A.2d 69 (1960)
  • (Assent to Standardized Forms)
• Case Brief #8 – Lenawee County Board of Health v. Messerly, 416 Mich. 17, 331 N.W.2d 203 (1982)
  • (Mistake)
• Case Brief #9 – Lloyd v. Murphy, 25 Cal.2d 48, 153 P.2d 47 (1944)
  • (Justification for Non-Performance)
• Case Brief #10 – Brown Machine, Inc. v. Hercules, Inc., 770 S.W.2d 416 (1989)
  • (Qualified Acceptances; U.C.C. 2-207)

SYLABUS  –  MIDTERMS QUESTION  – MIDTERM RESPONSE – CRIMINAL LAW DEFINITIONS  –  OUTLINE

• Case Brief #1 – State v. Rocker, 52 Haw. 336, 475 P.2d 684 (Hawaii 1970 ) (1970)
  • (Intent)
• Case Brief #2 – County Court of Ulster County, N.Y. v. Allen, 442 U.S. 140, 99 S.Ct. 2213, 60 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979)
  • (Possession)
• Case Brief #3 – United States v. Chagra, 807 F.2d.398 (1986)
  • (Mental State of Conspiracy)
• Case Brief #4 – Daniel M’Naghten’s Case, 8 Eng. Rep. 718, 10 Cl.&Fin. 200 (1843)
  • (Insanity)
• Case Brief #5 – Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684, 95 S.Ct. 1881, 44 L.Ed.2d 508 (1975)
  • (Heat of Passion Test)
• Case Brief #6 – Hyam v. Director of Public Prosecutions, 2 All.E.R. 41, A.C. 55, 2 W .L.R. 607 (1975)
  • (Murder – Mens Rea – Intention – Foresight)
• Case Brief #7 – State v. Goodseal, 220 Kan. 487, 553 P.2d 279 (Kansas 1976)
  • (Felony Murder)
• Case Brief #8 – United States v. Jewell, 532 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1976)
  • (Knowledge)
• Case Brief #9 – United States v. Peterson, 483 F.2d 1222, 157 U.S.App.D.C. 219 (D.C.Cir. 1973)
  • (Self Defense)
• Case Brief #10 – United States v. Brown, 518 F.2d 821 (1975)
  • (Deliberate & Premeditated)

SYLABUS  –  MIDTERMS  – MIDTERM RESPONSE –  TORT LAW DEFINITIONS  –  OUTLINE

• Case Brief #1 – Rylands v. Fletcher, 3 H & C 774, 159 Eng.Rep. 737, L.R. 1 Ex. 265 (1866)
  • (Strict Liability)
• Case Brief #2 – Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., 601 F.2d 516, 444 U.S. 931, 100 S.Ct. 275, 62 L.Ed.2d 188 (1979)
  • (Consent)
• Case Brief #3 – Larson v. St. Francis Hotel, 83 Cal.App.2d 210, 188 P.2d 513 (1948)
  • (Negligence)
• Case Brief #4 – Summers v. Tice, 33 Cal.2d 80, 199 P.2d 1, 5 A.L.R.2d 91 (1948)
  • (Problems in Determining which Party Caused the Harm)
• Case Brief #5 – Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99, 59 A.L.R. 1253 (1928)
  • (Unforseeable Consequences)
• Case Brief #6 – Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California, 17 Cal.3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal.Rptr. 14 (1976)
  • (Failure to Act)
• Case Brief #7 – Rowland v. Christian, 69 Cal.2d 108, 443 P.2d 561, 70 Cal. Rptr. 97 (1968)
  • (Premises Liability)
• Case Brief #8 – Li v. Yellow Cab Co. of California, 13 Cal.3d 804, 119 Cal.Rptr. 858, 532 P.2d 1226 (1975)
  • (Comparative Negligence)
• Case Brief #9 – MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050 (1916)
  • (Privity)
• Case Brief #10 – Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc., 32 N.J. 358, 161 A.2d 69 (1960)
  • (Products Liability: Implied Warranty)
• Case Brief #11 – Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Hercules, Inc., 762 F.2d 303 (1985)
  • (Nuisance)
• Case Brief #12 – New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964)
  • (Defamation)
• Case Brief #13 – Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46, 108 S.Ct. 876, 99 L.Ed.2d 41 (1988)
  • (Invasion of Privacy)